I don't know about that. MLPchan's /oat/ was rather full of political threads, and there were at least two posters that were full on nutters.
Then at least have the courtesy to provide examples of that poster's conduct that was, as implied by >>13113
, had contradicted his own position and was just after a rise.
Because otherwise, I'm left seeing an OP talking in very tame, plain terms about immigration, with the only noteworthy aspect being a term that has been massively popularized due to recent alleged claims of statements from Trump.
You may well post on /pol/ occasionally, but that does not make this bait. This would be laughably tame by /pol/ standards. This is literally nothing, mate. It's an incredibly basic thread. Fuck, it's not even a partisan issue. It's not even one that, at least prior to Trump, has drummed up much controversy.
It was the standard for ages now not to bring in immigrants of poor quality. Every president for ages has sought to bring in high-standard people, not bottom-bin types with no skills.
Mikie, it wasn't bait.
Or if it was bait, you're going to ban every remotely rightwing position.
Please, either get some damn definitions set up for this stuff, or just outright ban politics.
This kind of wishy-washy 'ban what i feel like' shit kills communities. Hell, I'll even say it's what caused the initial split into MLPchan.