The primary issue with PC culture is a tale that has been told for millennia. The boy who cried wolf. Too many false alarms and people are going to stop taking you seriously.
That is primarily the danger that PC culture causes. If you cry "rape" every time someone looks at you in a way you didn't feel comfortable with, eventually people crying rape are going to be ignored completely, even if it actually IS valid.
What this boils down to is not understanding intent, and intent means everything. If someone says something that could be considered offensive, but when they said it they weren't really thinking about it in that way, and people start to dogpile on that person for what they said instead of what they meant, eventually those people are going to have their complaints dismissed even when they actually are valid.
It's not about 'suck it up and stop being offended' more than it is, 'Consider if that thing was actually meant to offend you, or are you seeing something that isn't actually there.'
The major issue right now is that when people say they fear PC culture, the proponents of PC culture are like, "You just want to say the N word." but that isn't actually the case. What is actually happening is people are scared they may say or do something they have no idea is offensive to someone, without meaning to be offensive to anyone, and have someone get offended by it.
An example of this is say you were writing a story about some guy that was super rich and he had a butler that worked for him and his family for years. Like say, Bruce Wayne and Alfred. Everyone likes this duo, they understand the dynamic.
Now let's say someone remakes Batman but casts Alfred as a black man. Same exact character, same association to Bruce Wayne, same exact depiction of characters.
This would never happen. Do you know why? Even if the intent was to diversify a story, there are thousands of people that would IMMEDIATELY throw a fit because a 'black man serves a white family'. It would be a shit show.
What is this? This is basically racism, but it's from the side that says they are against racism. If the characters change nothing but the colors of their skin, why is one offensive and the other is not? There is no implication here, the only implication comes from people misinterpreting what they are seeing as something it's not supposed to be and then getting outraged over it.
This is where we have problems, because instead of real issues being addressed, these pointless issues get all the attention when they weren't even meant in the way people are making them out to be in the first place.
This post was edited by its author on .