>>359667>So you don't like his policies which means you won't vote for him and have a vested interest in getting others to not vote for him, but on top of that you now think he's a big stinky buttface so won't vote for him and still have a vested interest in getting others to not vote for him? Damn.
It's like you've never heard of the concept of bipartisanship, or reaching across the aisle to your political rivals. Again, do you want people who disagree
with Bernie to also
hate him? Like, does that help him somehow?
>he sort of lost his credibility by showing zero spine during the last election
primarily, rolling over and letting Hillary just take the primary, and then giving her his blessing for the pleasure.
and also, standing idly by while people commandeer his campaign rally, which looks great for a would-be leader of the free world
>>"I don't agree with his policies, but the Democrats done him dirty, so I can still root for him", but now he's losing that too>??
As I said above, Bernie is now arguing against his own formerly held position, which is that the Dems stacked the deck against him, because Trump agreed with the position, and disagreeing with Trump is more important than pointing out the corruption within his own party. As they say, Trump could come out in favor of oxygen, and Democrats would hold their breath.
>>And it's not like I want the Democratic party to consist of lunatics.>I honestly call into question what your measure of what makes one a lunatic or not.
There are certain key issues.
>>I mean, do you want him to lose?>Do you want him to lose?
Within the Democratic primary? No; I don't particularly want him to lose, and I think it would be good for him to make it to the general election. In the general? Yes; because I don't support his positions over all, I don't think he would be an effective leader, and he's part of a party that has done nothing but give me reasons to detest it.
>Yikes Bernie's done for.
Warren has clearly never lied by definition. /shrug>>359670>Yeah, i agreed the media is bias to the DNC, but for some reason you're demanding a candidate needlessly react to what some extremist said, just to appease you, like your important at all.
That's how you get support - by telling people they aren't important. /popcorn>It would be stupid for Bernie to make a controversy bigger than it needs to be, neither would trump. Esp when he already always says he is against it, and esp durring a primary where the media is bias against him.
Again, I point you back to the same article that you
posted. A Trump campaigner was fired instantly
by the campaign for what was essentially... a
slur against some random nobody? and a nonsense comment about Obama that sounds like something a drunk uncle would say? and for that
, he got shitcanned. instantly. And you expect me to believe, that if this guy was just kept on the campaign, and the campaign said nothing and refused to acknowledge it, that this wouldn't itself be a massive scandal against Trump?
But if I hold Bernie to the exact same standard
, that I am a hypocrite. alright, sure. /popcorn>But you're giving me this "Bernie just wont do it because he knows the majority of his support are tankies that want gulags, and he knows it will ruin him if he condems it because he will lose all his support" bullshit.
I didn't say majority, either. But keep putting words in my mouth. /popcorn>He is not doing it because he is smart enough to not willingly associate his name with those retards any more than it already it, and he is smart enough to know doing that just to cater to some political screamer and get an "A+" from some dude on the internet who would latch onto the next controversy reguardless would be mental.
Hey, I'm just some guy with an opinion. You don't like my opinion? Tough shit.>You really think he gives a fuck what your kind thinks when your just going to start freaking out over the next thing anyway? No. No one fucking does.
No, I don't think Bernie "White people don't know what it's like to be poor" Sanders gives a fuck what I think, which is yet another reason why I'm going to be voting against him if given the chance.
This post was edited by its author on .