A little bit, yes. >>353049
Because you have no explanation of what a "sacred law" is, and there is no common definition of such a thing, and there is no telling which laws would be considered "sacred" and if i would agree with them / it would be appropriate to lack the ability to violate them in 100% of situations.
Since its already been said that law making would fallow the same conditions as they currently do, then chances are, most all laws would be considered and labeled "sacred" by the law makers, thus making an ability to violate lesser laws a moot ability.
This post was edited by its author on .