>>243499>"violence is inevitable and when the time comes, your side is your race">"I'm not advocating for any violence"
There's a big difference between advocating violence and predicting it.
Sorry buddy, not how this "I didn't want to do it but (((you))) forced my hand" rhetoric works
At what point in this conversation did I bring up the Jews?
I believe that what's happening to White people is mostly the fault of White people. The Jews may play a disproportionate role in that, but they would have absolutely no power over us if we ourselves weren't so weak and corrupted. This is MOSTLY our fault, and no one elses.>>243502
I can't control what others with similar beliefs to my own advocate.
I've already said that my personal and political beliefs don't align. Do you think I chose to believe what I believe because it's fun, for the bants? Because I don't. I don't like a lot of the things that I'm forced to believe in, and I try to stay as moderate and open minded as possible, but I'm not willing to change my opinion on something because I don't like the truth. I may lack many things, but ideological integrity is not one of them.
There are countless things within National Socialism that I personally don't like, but see the necessity in. I don't like the thought of oppressing certain groups within society, in fact it sickens me to think of everything that will likely happen in the future. But I'm not willing to disregard something because it makes me feel bad, or it contradicts what I'd personally like in an idea scenario.
You guys don't realise that half of the time I'm just as morally repulsed by certain things that I argue for as you are. But as I've said I still believe in them and I still argue for them, because I believe that they are the NECESSARY EVIL of our time.
Would you rather that people like me who only follow National Socialism out of a sense of obligation to the truth, (assuming that what I believe is the truth) but despite this try to be as forgiving and moderate as possible are at the front lines of the debate, or would you rather have the genuine radicals who have no sense of morality, guilt, or balance be the people you argue with.
I REALLY don't like being lumped in with a lot of the people at /pol/, I'm nothing like them other than the fact that we happen to share similar political views.
Have I made you genuinely angry? I've seen that your Trixe aswell as the way you talk to me has gotten more hostile overtime. I'm genuinely sorry if I angered you.
You know my first instinct when seeing this thread was "no, fuck it. It's really not worth getting into a thread like this because I know that I'll inevitably hurt people and cause drama." But I ignore that and posted anyway. Fuck me, I should have probably just went with my first instinct.>>243512>Migrants pay more in taxes than they consume, and white and non-white IQs are converging
80% of Muslims are on welfare, and that's not including the Muslims that work but don't make enough in tax to be contributing members of society. Even if we were extremely generous and said that 1/3 of Muslims contribute to society in other ways (volunteering, bringing foreign money into the country, etc) than traditional employment, at least 47% of Muslims would still be welfare leaches.https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.thesun.co.uk/news/4411913/just-one-in-five-muslims-are-in-work-as-report-finds-they-are-held-back-by-racism/amp/
Here's another one on Muslims in Germany.
Aslo the reason that IQs are converging within White countries is most likely due to race mixing aswell as dysgenic breeding, in the forum of the welfare state.
Provide sources next time.>>243529>You know what fuels the Islamist extremist groups and radicalizes them?
Their devotion to Allah, and the promise of a future European Caliphate?
>But fine, you're right, let's just pre-emptively strike every single group that might feel endangered by us, so they don't pre-emptively strike us first. You know, just to be safe. Let's vindicate their fear. I don't see how that can possibly go wrong
To be fair we did kind of start it. But it's not the fault of people like me or you that we went to war with their people, it's the fault of our politicians.
I don't plan on making the first strike. I plan on sitting back and waiting until they make there's. As I said I think that this is inevitable, and it'll most likely be started by them.
>Maybe, just maybe, you're the ones too fucking stupid to handle the truth
I'm willing to accept that as a possibility, but to be honest I think it's unlikely.
>I hate having to be so harsh, but this has to stop
I know what you're talking about, I feel the same way.
>Wake up now, or be complicit in feeding and encouraging a conflict that has potential to actually destroy the civilization you claim to hold so dear. This isn't a fucking Call of Duty game
I understand that this isn't a game, and I think what you would define as "my civilisation" is vastly different to how I would define it. My civilisation doesn't exist without my people in it.
I just got out of my shower, sorry for the wait.