Not really. Near as I can tell, absolutely none of them want equality of outcome. They don't even really want equality of opportunity, as that's a poor phrasing, given that it could be taken to mean the cripple should have just as much chance to get into the Olympics as a proper athlete. Only "equality" they want is equal treatment in regards to rights.
Which is of course individualism, as opposed to the tyrannical tendencies of the collectivists SJW who, much as the fascists or the Communists, are more than happy to sacrifice people's rights, what they've earned, the very concept of justice, in the name of a greater good. This case being equality of outcome.
>How do most of these people view the 50-60s civil rights era?
Depends on who you ask. Some don't like it, some do, plenty seem to have doubts but see it as necessary. Personally, I think it needs to be extended to everyone, otherwise it isn't fair, and should be removed. Law should apply to everyone the same. But, then, I'm a bit of an oddball when it comes to that sort of thing, as I fully recognize companies can violate individual rights, and if a nation's purpose is as I believe it to be, protecting those rights, it may be necessary to say that no company should be able to discriminate based on items not relating to the job, IE political, religious, or social beliefs.
Seems we're hitting dangerous territory where a bad guy can simply be unpersoned by companies if they decide he doesn't fit their standard for "good". Companies should not be moral arbiters. Nazis and Communists should have access to basic necessities despite their beliefs. They should be able to live their lives without restriction, unless they are directly harming others.
>Other than the free speech issue, "positive" discrimination, and the whole more than two genders thing, what actually differentiates anti SJW's from SJW's?
Collectivism vs individualism.
The SJWs would happily see peoples rights restricted, if it means their social goals are met. Hell, I'm convinced they're okay with the flat murder of their rivals, as they see them as an existential threat. Point being, the SJW does not value rights any more than the fascists or the Communists.
Meanwhile, the liberal is an individualist first and foremost. They believe in rights. Their foundation is rights. The individual's rights should not be sold for some kind of societal equality, "progress", or other supposed "good".