It's a pretty easy "why". Because of the cultural link.
These names didn't come out of nothing.
The same as why Sven is a Nordic name.
Strange way of phrasing it. I guess you're meaning that of the two who consider Jamarcus to be a "black people name", rather than the full three, one of them considers race and culture to be separate.
Which makes no sense to me, as that'd necessarily mean that it isn't a "black people name".
Unless you're saying that you can believe it to be a "black people name" and not discriminate. Which is yet weirder still.
But, whatever, it doesn't really matter in the grand scheme of things.
Problem is, race is merely tied to locations, for the most part. But there's lots of places in the locations you have a race. Not all blacks are Nigerians, not all Asians are Chinese.
So, while "Sven" might be white, his culture is not "white culture", is it?
It's Nordic culture. Because thats' where he's from. That's where his name came from. Same for Cheng, Kobiyashuru, Muhamed, Jose, and so on.
These are cultures of nations, not race, that dictate these names. If you stuck white man in Asia, with Chinese culture, Cheng'd be a 'white' name, by your reckoning.
do they discriminate.
You seem to fail to realize, racism doesn't come from nowhere. It isn't something we're naturally inclined towards as humans. This isn't something that comes up out of the blue.
They discriminate against a race because of a culture, because they use your own thinking
Because they see that culture as "black".
Because they see Jamal as a black name. Just like you do. You've got the same mentality, you should be able to understand this. They're simply doing the reverse of your thought process, here.
There is a 100% chance they did it because of the culture. Because if the culture did not exist, they would have no reason to discriminate.
Again, you assume racism to come from nowhere. To be something that just "is".
Your stance is that Jamarcus is being discriminated against on racial grounds. The number of people not giving him a job are irrelevant.
Please, do not be an insufferable assmonkey faggot half-failed abortion about this shit. The reason I 'throw a tantrum" as you put it is because I cannot stand dishonest argumentation. And you are swiftly running head first into dishonest argumentation to protect your own bigotry, I must assume.
There's nothing to gain by being such an asshound. You aren't interested in good faith. That much is clear. So, why are you here? Why do you continue to post? Do you think you'll sway anyone, playing the fool, dancing around the issue, and never taking a real stance? Do you think I'd just accept your dishonesty at face value? Do you think I'd just allow you to do as you damn well please, hopping around, never actually addressing a thing, because you're a coward without principles, and never call you on it?