Yeah, Bontekoe comes to mind, but it's a bit of a touchy issue since i.e. American influence has brought some American problems to influence public opinion here.
Things like slavery, colonies, imperialism, and racism make it something that many avoid talking about too loosely.
I'd call it generic SJWing but's more thorough than that, and its relative silence lies in part due to the fact that even the heart of its advocates and critcs is filled with contradictions.
Practically you should think of 'slavery' being a touchy subject to talk about at all, while there have been many figures in dutch history that have been untroubled to point out it's really not all that different from 'free' paid work, as they often proceeded to illustrate.
Likewise the black race color and the word nigger (in dutch 'neger') do not carry quite the same load here, it was simply not abused so recently, it has left some traditions also somewhat criticised. (though ironically not in the few colonies and ex colonies we still have frequent contact with, despite them having a lot more day to day interaction between blacks and whites the traditions remain unaltered even in a nation that fought for its independence genocide versus genocide)
As for colonies: The idea of white man's burden has literally been relegated to pure racism, while if you look at sources from the time you'd realise it's often a far cry from it; it was mostly a relatively simple comparison of socio-economic circumstances.
And finally imperialism which is often cast as the prime evil and as if somehow being responsible for the evils of the second world war (we didn't participate in the first one after all) despite the fact that literally all parties involved were or would end up as imperialists regardless of their intents and rhetoric.
So the result is what you'd expect from the Netherlands: Compromise, learning.
I forgot the name of the guy who said it, but he said the following: Being a frenchman means remembering the parts where you fought together, and forget the times you murdered eachother over faith or somesuch. (of course not the literal wording, but i only remembered the stretch of what he said)
Which leaves us in a position where there is something about which there can be no compromise, namely factual history, has to be 'compromised' into something acceptable for all.
The impossible nature of such a movement has either stunned or silenced people here, as the uneasy silence is the only answer that has been produced by all involved.
It's a limit to our approach, one that leaves us bare as our rich history is suddenly 'silenced to death', a word that doesn't really work at all in english. ('doodzwijgen', with 'dood' obviously meaning 'dead' but 'zwijgen' having no proper equivalent in english, as it is a verb that means to practice an active, intentional form of being silent, like when keeping a secret, or when observing, or somesuch, it is probably the most typically dutch word there is; the father of the fatherland is known as William the Silent in English, but in Dutch he's Willem de Zwijger)
Also it is late and i feel the need to sleep well, and find my memory failing a bit too often right now.
So good night.
(also if you want the best of the dutch Antilles i'd advise you to go to Bonaire, not Aruba)
This post was edited by its author on .